htmldesigner - Urban Defacement
Holy crap! How'd you manage that? http://www.hellboundhackers.org/images/car.jpg
Ok I see some folks don't believe my defacement is real which is fine I really don't care your not the one who almost got caught trying to prove to cheese it was real also I will deface another police car or something orientied to them in the very near future with the same square computer paper that I used the first time to prove I had the "Balls" to do it the first time as for the paper looking perfectly square it was a calm day and I had the time to line the paper up and in my other one it was windy as hell Any questions or doubts feel free to ask
htmldesigner wrote: Ok I see some folks don't believe my defacement is real which is fine I really don't care your not the one who almost got caught trying to prove to cheese it was real also I will deface another police car or something orientied to them in the very near future with the same square computer paper that I used the first time to prove I had the "Balls" to do it the first time as for the paper looking perfectly square it was a calm day and I had the time to line the paper up and in my other one it was windy as hell Any questions or doubts feel free to ask
The same perfectly square paper? You lined it up pixel by pixel perfectly with the bottom of the cutoff on the camera lens. How did you do that, may I ask? Also, how did you keep there from being any tape marks of any sort showing either on the paper or wrinkling the paper? Plus, how did you keep there from being a shadow, either? PLUS, how'd you manage to make the shadow of the paper backwards? As in, the shadow from the car is cast down and to the left in the perspective of the shot. The paper, however, is shadowed to the right, even though it is perfectly flat with not a slight hint of curvature. And one final note. If you look in the bottom left hand side of the paper, there's a wrinkle/crease or something, and yet the paper is still perfectly square and runs perpendicular to the respective sides of the image itself. Crazy! You must have had days to get that to work.
htmldesigner wrote: Ok I see some folks don't believe my defacement is real which is fine I really don't care your not the one who almost got caught trying to prove to cheese it was real also I will deface another police car or something orientied to them in the very near future with the same square computer paper that I used the first time to prove I had the "Balls" to do it the first time as for the paper looking perfectly square it was a calm day and I had the time to line the paper up and in my other one it was windy as hell Any questions or doubts feel free to ask
Dude, Ive worked with PhotoShop for 4 months, I can tell its work very easy. no use in trying to say its real. is that is real then your cop car was a picture. I didnt have to open it with PS to see the weakness in it.
If you are going to do a fake one, AT LEAST say its a fake.
Bl4ckC4t
thousandtoone wrote: Congratulations. I'm glad you've worked with Photoshop for 4 months. How do you know he did it in Photoshop? He could've used Corel, Paint Show Pro , or even Paint.NET and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference short of checking EXIF data, which can always be faked.
Eat my high-res ass.
Question:
Why the fuck dont you like me? your one of the few around here that pretty much tells me to fuck off when I havent done anything to you.
Just a question.
Bl4ckC4t
That post wasn't in any dislike to you. I don't dislike you. I just felt that you had no reason to bring up that little fact about yourself other than to try and show your expertise, however limited it may be. If you think I don't like you because of my comments on your article, that's your own problem. Try writing a better article.
thousandtoone wrote: That post wasn't in any dislike to you. I don't dislike you. I just felt that you had no reason to bring up that little fact about yourself other than to try and show your expertise, however limited it may be. If you think I don't like you because of my comments on your article, that's your own problem. Try writing a better article.
It wasnt to show my expertise, I was merely saying that it looked like a photoshop job with references on how I can tell