Sig me
spyware wrote: MD5 is an outdated and broken cryptographic algorithm and shouldn't be used to store data.
Why would you want to represent this broken algo in your sig?
because it represents how quickly the "greatest" encryption methods can be broken. And is a great representation of the knowledge base that can be found in the participants of this site.
pimpim wrote: [url]http://www.gimp.org/ [/url] :evil::evil:
Thanks, will that download also give me artistic talent as well? because thats why I am asking …
spyware wrote: MD5 is an outdated and broken cryptographic algorithm and shouldn't be used to store data.
Why would you want to represent this broken algo in your sig?
Good point.
a44gas wrote: because it represents how quickly the "greatest" encryption methods can be broken. And is a great representation of the knowledge base that can be found in the participants of this site.
Not really a good point.
a44gas wrote: Im not into flamewars, so let me know when you guys are done.
I was hoping I could actually get a sig out of this, but i'm guessing you will all just flame the thread into the ground.
Hey thats not called flamewars. Spyware just asked you a question and 4544474… just told that whether your point was correct or not. Its called discussion not flaming.
a44gas wrote: [quote]pimpim wrote: I'm not a good artist, but I made one anyway.
And yes, I DO overuse Gaussian Blur… ;)
Thank you for your valid contribution to the thread. Its actually half decent, I will consider it for my sig. :)[/quote]
Are you kidding me? Mine was a joke and it's prettier.
"Answer this for me r3dwood (nice use of 1337 sp33k, hax0r!!): What did I do to you to incur your so-called "hatred and pain"?
and please, try to be mature with your response."
I'm very sorry. The next time I hijack an account I will make sure to choose a more not 1337ish one.