Sarah Palin - HACKED!
I thought it was an interesting read, VP hopeful Sarah Palin just got hacked. http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9114934 Check it out, leave comments.
Oh, right. Nothing fancy, really.
Mails;```markup yahoo-account-services-us@cc.yahoo-inc.com Your Yahoo! password was changed 4:23 AM 5KB Read
19079829061@mms.dobson.net LOOK AT TRIG!!!!! 12:36 AM 52KB Read
Amy McCorkell HI SARAH Sun, 9/14/08 4KB Read
You replied to this message Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 9/13/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 9/13/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 9/13/08 3KB Read
Candy Sunderland Welcome Home! Wed, 9/10/08 17KB Read
Juanita Re: Hello! Mon, 9/8/08 3KB Read
Fatkidron@aol.com Attachments
Fwd: Fw: A story you will never read anywhere else. Mon, 9/8/08 20KB Unread
Remus
Read: Hello! Mon, 9/8/08 3KB Read
JD & Trish
cousin jason Sat, 9/6/08 6KB Unread
Amy McCorkell
Read: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 3KB Unread
Juanita
Read: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 3KB Read
Jon Morgan
Attachments
From Cousin Jon Fri, 9/5/08 76KB Unread
Delivered: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 2KB Read
Ivy Frye
Re: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 4KB Unread
Delivered: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 2KB Read
Juanita Fuller
Return Receipt: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 2KB Unread
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Hello! Fri, 9/5/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: Wed, 9/3/08 2KB Unread
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: Tue, 9/2/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: Tue, 9/2/08 3KB Read
Sally Heath Read: Tri-Cities family coming to convention Mon, 9/1/08 3KB Unread
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Delivered: Fw: Tri-Cities family coming to convention Sun, 8/31/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye
[ No Subject ] Sun, 8/31/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye veep talking pts Sun, 8/31/08 9KB Read
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Attachments Kids 3378.jpg Sun, 8/31/08 25KB Read
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Attachments Kids 3378.jpg Sun, 8/31/08 25KB Read
Greg and Brandi Jones Congrats from your cousins Sat, 8/30/08 4KB Read
katie MY INPUT FOR SARAH IN THE TRI CITY HERALD…..YEA DOGGIES Sat, 8/30/08 9KB Read
Sally Heath Re: WhooHoo Sat, 8/30/08 3KB Unread
Sally Heath Read: WhooHoo Sat, 8/30/08 3KB Read
Meghan Stapleton Attachments FW: Motor Fuel Tax Suspension Sat, 8/30/08 1169KB Read
Ivy Frye [ No Subject ] Sat, 8/30/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye [ No Subject ] Sat, 8/30/08 3KB Read
finch@ncidata.com Read: WhooHoo Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Read
gov.sarah@yahoo.com Re: From JP Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Read
Judy Patrick JP cell 223-4704 Fri, 8/29/08 2KB Read
Judy Patrick From JP Fri, 8/29/08 2KB Read
Goode, Kelly C (GOV) Re: What a day! Fri, 8/29/08 5KB Read
Goode, Kelly C (GOV) What a day! Fri, 8/29/08 5KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Fri, 8/29/08 3KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Draft letter to Governor Schwarzenegger / Container Tax Thu, 8/28/08 12KB Read
frank bailey link Wed, 8/27/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Wed, 8/27/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Wed, 8/27/08 3KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
FW: Thanks Mon, 8/25/08 7KB Read
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: change Mon, 8/25/08 3KB Unread
Delivered: Re: change Mon, 8/25/08 2KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: change Mon, 8/25/08 3KB Read
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 8/23/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 8/23/08 3KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Sat, 8/23/08 3KB Read
McBride, Rhonda (GOV) Rural Wireless Service Sat, 8/23/08 32KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) RE: Using Royalty Oil to Lower the Cost of Fuel for Alaskans Fri, 8/22/08 42KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) RE: Please approve Fri, 8/22/08 11KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Court of Appeals / Executive Director Parole Board / Boards and Commissions Thu, 8/21/08 10KB Unread
Ivy Frye Delivered: Re: Merge to left Thu, 8/21/08 3KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) FW: DPS Employee Draft Wed, 8/20/08 15KB Read
McAllister, William D (GOV) Re: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues Wed, 8/20/08 12KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) FW: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues Tue, 8/19/08 11KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Court of Appeals Nominations Sat, 8/16/08 11KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) another records request Fri, 8/15/08 5KB Read
frank bailey Attachments Letter Thu, 8/14/08 293KB Read
McBride, Rhonda (GOV) Tara Jollie's B-Day Tue, 8/12/08 8KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 Tue, 8/12/08 25KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 Tue, 8/12/08 22KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 Tue, 8/12/08 18KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) Attachments FW: Capitalizing on coal reserves, Crow Tribe strikes deal for $7B Tue, 8/12/08 10KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 - CG Dinner Mon, 8/11/08 29KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 Sun, 8/10/08 28KB Read
Mason, Janice L (GOV) Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 Sun, 8/10/08 24KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Status report Fri, 8/8/08 6KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) FW: Special session press release Fri, 8/8/08 29KB Read
Colberg, Talis J (LAW) Followup. Fri, 8/8/08 4KB Unread
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Delivered: $$$ Thu, 8/7/08 3KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter Thu, 8/7/08 5KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) Attachments FW: John Harris's response to Lyda Green Thu, 8/7/08 68KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) RE: Request for Information and Documents Thu, 8/7/08 10KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter Thu, 8/7/08 3KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) Attachments FW: Request for Information and Documents Thu, 8/7/08 525KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) Attachments FW: Memorandum of Law Thu, 8/7/08 669KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV) Attachments FW: Informal Meeting with Gov. Palin Next Week Thu, 8/7/08 268KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Attachments FW: PR 08-2598 Summer 2009 Schedule Released Wed, 8/6/08 770KB Read
Rutherford, Marty K (DNR) Re: AO Wed, 8/6/08 4KB Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV) Update Wed, 8/6/08 5KB Read
Sean Parnell RE: Meet and Greet Tue, 8/5/08 20KB Read
gov.sarah@yahoo.com Fw: Meet and Greet Tue, 8/5/08 20KB Unread
ftb907@hslak.com Delivered: Re: weekend statement Tue, 8/5/08 2KB Unread
ftb907@hslak.com Delivered: Re: weekend statement Tue, 8/5/08 2KB Read
McBride, Rhonda (GOV) Walter Soboleff Tue, 8/5/08 10KB Unread
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Delivered: Fw: Willow Tue, 8/5/08 3KB Read
katie Re: HEY Mon, 8/4/08 3KB Read
Palin, J.D. RE: Willow Mon, 8/4/08 3KB Read
Karl Clauson Attachments weekend statement Mon, 8/4/08 52KB Read
fek9wnr@yahoo.com Delivered: Re: Staff at the House on Saturday Morning Sat, 8/2/08 3KB Read
Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
FW: info from today```
Contact list; markupBeth Leschper (Beth Leschper SOA) [Edit] beth.leschper@alaska.gov Blanche Kallstrom (Blanche) [Edit] mbkrdk@starband.net Bristol Palin (Bristol) [Edit] bristol_palin@hotmail.com Chuck Heath (Chuck) [Edit] chckheath@yahoo.com fek9wnr@yahoo.com (Todd) [Edit] fek9wnr@yahoo.com ftb907@yahoo.com (Frank) [Edit] ftb907@yahoo.com Heather Bruce (Heather) [Edit] khbruce@gci.net ivy.frye@alaska.gov (Ivy SOA) [Edit] ivy.frye@alaska.gov ivyfrye@yahoo.com (Ivy Personal) [Edit] ivyfrye@yahoo.com Judy Patrick (Judy Patrick) [Edit] jpphoto@mtaonline.net kris.perry@alaska.gov (Kris Perry SOA) [Edit] kris.perry@alaska.gov krisandclark@yahoo.com (Kris Personal) [Edit] krisandclark@yahoo.com paymckhea@yahoo.com (Molly) [Edit] paymckhea@yahoo.com Roseanne Hughes (Roseanne Hughes SOA) [Edit] roseanne.hughes@alaska.gov Sally Heath (Mom) [Edit] salheath@mtaonline.net Sean Parnell (Sean Personal) [Edit] sparnell@alaska.com Sharon Leighow (Sharon SOA) [Edit] sharon.leighow@alaska.gov Sleighow@aol.com (Sharon Leighow Personal) [Edit] Sleighow@aol.com Track Palin (Track) [Edit] track_44@hotmail.com
Account info; ```markupA'ight. Sarah Palin account info: gov.palin@yahoo.com DOB 2/11/64 ZIP 99687 CURRENTLY LOCKED FOR 24 HOURS (no shit, Sherlock)
Todd Palin: fek9wnr@yahoo.com DOB: 9/6/64 ZIP 99654 (wtf, amirite?) Favorite Pastime: NOT 'snowmobiling', 'racing snowmobiles', or 'sex'. I got bored after that.
Ivy Frye: ivyfrye@yahoo.com google don't got nada, but that's where the juicy shit will be, if there is anything incriminating.```
This information was not obtained by me. I do not condone personal attacks on Sarah "Bitch" Palin.
I loved reading this story this morning… I'm hoping that the method used will be put out by the group 'Anonymous'! This not only goes against her hiding government e-mails in personal e-mail as she denied but it shows that maybe she should of used something more secure than yahoo when your birthday and zip code are public! I'm still looking for decent screenshots though…
Hmm, I wonder if this might work in her favour however? The general public will probably see her as being victimized by 'evil hackers' and the 'media'. Meh, I don't really follow US politics much. She was pretty fucking stupid to use Yahoo for work stuff though. She probably thought gov.* was the same as *,gov, lol.
I just googled her name and found this, "Sarah Palin, is an evangelical Protestant with a strong record of opposition to abortion and an openness to teaching creationism". Dumb bitch . How can we have someone like that be the Vice President for one of the biggest countries in the world?
**japanesedude wrote:**I just googled her name and found this, "Sarah Palin, is an evangelical Protestant with a strong record of opposition to abortion and an openness to teaching creationism". Dumb bitch . How can we have someone like that be the Vice President for one of the biggest countries in the world?
That's just the tip of the iceberg, dude. Tip. Iceberg, I tell you.
The iceberg keeps going… she is a vindictive woman who cries sexism at any challenge… she's Bush in a bra. And if you feel your jaw dropping wondering how anyone can support this woman, try being an American as I am… Obama was going as a sure shot but then this woman comes along who has all the religious nuts following here! Thank goodness the economy took a dump and John McCain is not good at the economy, in his own words…
Amen to that shit. If anyone votes Republican after the economic crap and gas shortages that we've been seeing, then they're just an ignorant redneck. The pursuit of money has always been known to end badly… apparently, it takes a FEW repeats of history to learn that lesson in the inbred-centric areas.
Zephyr_Pure wrote: Amen to that shit. If anyone votes Republican after the economic crap and gas shortages that we've been seeing, then they're just an ignorant redneck. The pursuit of money has always been known to end badly… apparently, it takes a FEW repeats of history to learn that lesson in the inbred-centric areas.
Palin has a lot of personal problems IMO. Her daughter became pregnant at a young age (and she birthed a child with Down Syndrome), there is a scandal involving her husband, and she (nothing against the women) was simply chosen for the following facts:
A. She is a woman -to counter the fact that Obama is black (to give her celebrity status, note the fact that her sex is gaining attention as opposed to Obama's race now in politics), to gain popularity with the women, as well to pick up the disgruntled Hillary voters B. She is viewed as a very religious individual: anti-abortion, devout Christian
I could bad mouth the Democrats as easily as I could the Republicans. The Dems were the party of the KKK (Did you know the a guy still in Congress with KKK affiliations is the "honorable" Senator Robert 'KKK' Byrd of West Virginia. the longest serving dem senator there? He had the audacity to attempt to filibuster-prevent from passing- the Civil Rights Act of 1964), though they were founded by Andrew Jackson (who was a racist and allowed harsh treatment of the black and native population there), who reduced America's debt to the lowest it has ever been in history, and true to their word, were the party of the working man.
The Republicans were founded by Abraham Lincoln, and they initially helped to keep America together united as one nation, and if Lincoln had not shown the sternness that he did, the course of US history would have been much different. Interestingly enough, the man in my picture ran as a Republican (Ron Paul), and he is seen with a placard (the proper word escapes me), which is very atypical of modern Republicans.
Both parties have been beneficial to this nation, and now, both have become corrupt and detrimental to this nation. Yes, the pursuit of money has been very detrimental to this nation and it played a part in the horrific foreign policy which is already biting us in the ass.
[edit]Sorry if parts of this argument don't flow very nicely, I've edited this at least a good 30+ times[/edit]
To Mambo, yes the pics were ASKED to be pulled but were not, here is a link http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/18/ap-refuses-to-comply-with_n_127387.html
For pwnzall, remember some basic points from your statements… I liked them and reflect much of the reason George Washington said in his farewell adress that only have two parties would be devisive and the death of America… and when talking about Lincoln, remember that at the time of Lincoln, the Republican party was liberal… they were not conservitive by nature until after WWII and by the time of Nixon, they were then Progressive but now they've evolved to this socially based system that really scares me… the democrats are the opposite on swing, explaining Byrd who never left the party but the focus of the party left him… but I like Ron Paul… hope to hear more from him in the next few years!
Zephyr_Pure wrote: Amen to that shit. If anyone votes Republican after the economic crap and gas shortages that we've been seeing, then they're just an ignorant redneck. The pursuit of money has always been known to end badly… apparently, it takes a FEW repeats of history to learn that lesson in the inbred-centric areas.
Someone here doesn't understand the US government system here… The President has no control over how the money is spent. He makes up a budget, note, that Congress approves, adds BS onto it so they can get extra money for their constituents, and then Congress spends the money. The main thing that the President has major control on is foreign policy, about which Obama and Palin know jack.
Everyone can cry about Bill Clinton supposedly having surplus (not true - the national debt consistently rose while he was in office). But the real reason the economy went down the tube is because of economic bubbles bursting because of speculation. Bush (note, I don't like him either, I just have to live with choosing between evils) got the lousy end of the stick by inheriting the Dot com bubble burst, and it just went downhill from there.
Maybe if the government would stop borrowing money from social security to pay their bills, which is what drives a major part of the national debt, we could get out of this, but it'll take a lot more then a group of vapor coming from politicians.
japanesedude wrote: Hmm, I wonder if this might work in her favour however? The general public will probably see her as being victimized by 'evil hackers' and the 'media'. I suspect that this was staged as an attempt to get sympathy and publicity. Sounds like the 'hackers' didn't actually cause any damage, they just got access to the account and then made it known that they had done so.
EDIT: @ricktheguru - completely agree.
ricktheguru wrote: Someone here doesn't understand the US government system here… The President has no control over how the money is spent. He makes up a budget, note, that Congress approves, adds BS onto it so they can get extra money for their constituents, and then Congress spends the money.
Someone here doesn't know how to read. I specifically attacked the Republicans, not the President… the President is just a puppet on a string for the party. However, if I were to attack the President, my point would be short and sweet:
We've been "at war" for how many years? Are you aware of the extension of executive powers that a President gets in a time of war? …Do you think war is free?
Zephyr_Pure wrote: [quote]ricktheguru wrote: Someone here doesn't understand the US government system here… The President has no control over how the money is spent. He makes up a budget, note, that Congress approves, adds BS onto it so they can get extra money for their constituents, and then Congress spends the money.
Someone here doesn't know how to read. I specifically attacked the Republicans, not the President… the President is just a puppet on a string for the party. However, if I were to attack the President, my point would be short and sweet:
We've been "at war" for how many years? Are you aware of the extension of executive powers that a President gets in a time of war? …Do you think war is free?[/quote]
Ah, you see, I was under the impression that you were attacking one Republican in particular. Actually, I wouldn't mind having one side Republican (like, say, President?) then having a Democratic Congress. If they're arguing too much, then they can't steal our money as easily.
And I totally agree on the problem with the war. You see, the problem is we've declared war on an ideal (drugs, terrorism). As long as the ideas exist within the hearts of men, then we've declared an indefinite war.
Anyone else here ever read 1984? This reminds me of it.
Zephyr_Pure wrote: [quote]ricktheguru wrote: Someone here doesn't understand the US government system here… The President has no control over how the money is spent. He makes up a budget, note, that Congress approves, adds BS onto it so they can get extra money for their constituents, and then Congress spends the money.
Someone here doesn't know how to read. I specifically attacked the Republicans, not the President… the President is just a puppet on a string for the party. However, if I were to attack the President, my point would be short and sweet:
We've been "at war" for how many years? Are you aware of the extension of executive powers that a President gets in a time of war? …Do you think war is free?[/quote]
Ah, you see, I was under the impression that you were attacking one Republican in particular. Actually, I wouldn't mind having one side Republican (like, say, President?) then having a Democratic Congress. If they're arguing too much, then they can't steal our money as easily.
And I totally agree on the problem with the war. You see, the problem is we've declared war on an ideal (drugs, terrorism). As long as the ideas exist within the hearts of men, then we've declared an indefinite war.
Anyone else here ever read 1984? This reminds me of it.
ricktheguru wrote: And I totally agree on the problem with the war. You see, the problem is we've declared war on an ideal (drugs, terrorism). As long as the ideas exist within the hearts of men, then we've declared an indefinite war.
Exactly… and the war was extended longer than necessary so that Bush could sway the election for his second-term. In times of war, voters are less likely to embrace the idea of a new President. That is where our economic issues stem from directly.
zbert wrote:
For pwnzall, remember some basic points from your statements… I liked them and reflect much of the reason George Washington said in his farewell adress that only have two parties would be devisive and the death of America… and when talking about Lincoln, remember that at the time of Lincoln, the Republican party was liberal… they were not conservitive by nature until after WWII and by the time of Nixon, they were then Progressive but now they've evolved to this socially based system that really scares me… the democrats are the opposite on swing, explaining Byrd who never left the party but the focus of the party left him… but I like Ron Paul… hope to hear more from him in the next few years! I was going to add the whole Dem/Repub flipping ideas over the years, but I decided not to as it bloated the post. But other than that, I totally agree with your post.
Zephyr_Pure wrote:
Someone here doesn't know how to read. I specifically attacked the Republicans, not the President… the President is just a puppet on a string for the party. However, if I were to attack the President, my point would be short and sweet:
We've been "at war" for how many years? Are you aware of the extension of executive powers that a President gets in a time of war? …Do you think war is free?
Yes, at war, niceties such as political freedom are often usurped and a quasi-fascist state is imposed upon the people with little resistence. That part we agree with. What I disagree with you about is who to lay the blame on. I don't see why it is ONLY either "spineless libs" or "war mongering 'republican'ts'" causing all the trouble in the eyes of the other. As zbert said before, George Washington said before in his Farewall Address to beware of political parties that they would split the nation. Lincoln said a divided house can not stand.
My question to you… if Republicans and Democrats (speaking of politicians) make the same money, submit to lobbyists, and get caught in similar scandals, what makes one the good guy, and one the bad (I ask this with no intention to insult neither you, Republicans or Democrats)?
Thanks, I like the Ron Paul pic by the way… I'll say, I'm a vet of Iraq and I've got a vedetta against the people who voted for that war, regardless of party. I tend to be a left leaning independant but the 2006 and this election, I'm voting against the war on a large part. I will say that politicians should be changed often… they become corrupt the longer they are in!
Zephyr_Pure wrote: [quote]ericinsurgent wrote: was anyone else surprised that anon did something other then a DOS attack? No, considering a DoS attack would've yielded NOTHING.[/quote] i know a dos attack would not have done any thing of use, but "Anonymous" is /b/tards and that's the only thing a they have done up until now. For example the Scientology website and Soulja Boy website.
ericinsurgent wrote: No, considering a DoS attack would've yielded NOTHING. i know a dos attack would not have done any thing of use, but "Anonymous" is /b/tards and that's the only thing a they have done up until now. For example the Scientology website and Soulja Boy website.[/quote]
Nevermind the individual qualities of persons visiting 4chan, lets generalize the group into one big, DoS-capable-only group. Of all the people visiting 4chan, the chance that a few of them are skilled hackers is almost next to nothing, right?
zbert wrote: I'm voting against the war on a large part. I will say that politicians should be changed often… they become corrupt the longer they are in! Exactly what I was thinking and would say.
spyware wrote: Nevermind the individual qualities of persons visiting 4chan, lets generalize the group into one big, DoS-capable-only group. Of all the people visiting 4chan, the chance that a few of them are skilled hackers is almost next to nothing, right? Yeah, I think he was banking on the fact that a sweeping generalization like that should be funny. Nevermind that the concept of using a DoS attack to compromise a target and retrieve information is completely ludicrous and moronic… we're just making hollow jokes here.
Saturday morning cartoons used to be better than this. :whoa:
In capture, a member of Anonymous has a name.
His name is David Kernell.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/22/politics/horserace/entry4469760.shtml
no… it was a generic public email account with guessable settings. I don't think it's in any technical category.
she had to correctly answer the question, "Where did you meet your spouse?" The correct response, as deduced by the person who infiltrated the account: "Wasilla High."
I dont know at least this was known in public so that any person could have got into the account.
Apparently he is the son of State Representative Mike Kernell, Memphis.
bl4ckc4t wrote: http://terryfrank.net/?p=3591
Apparently he is the son of State Representative Mike Kernell, Memphis.
Everyone has parents, so what? Boy should be awarded a medal for showing the public this hypocrisy. First, the current republican pressure caused privacy to cease to exist. Project Echelon is watching, always. Then Sarah's private mail account, which she used to communicate about non-private matters, gets hacked and partially exposed. Suddenly all the republicans scream "no respect for privacy" and "personal mail is personal!" and whatnot. They are either IDIOTS or HYPOCRITES, probably both.
Echelon made sure that private mails get SIGINT'ed before you can say "unbalanced and unfair".
My email provider doesn't actually have a password reset option. Inconvenient if you forget your password, however a whole lot more secure.
Haha I think it's hilarious that in some news stories they state that Anonymous is an Internet hacker group of 'over 9000' members. (For those of you who don't know over 9000 is a meme)
macfarlanet wrote: My email provider doesn't actually have a password reset option. Inconvenient if you forget your password, however a whole lot more secure.
Haha I think it's hilarious that in some news stories they state that Anonymous is an Internet hacker group of 'over 9000' members. (For those of you who don't know over 9000 is a meme)
Anonymous is a large group of people. This large group includes paedophiles, thieves and hackers. This large group also includes your neighbour, several police officers, the woman from the grocery store and your son.
Damn it. Large groups. When will the media understand the principle of a LARGE, DIVERSE GROUP OF PEOPLE.
mmmmm yes indeed. It's funny how some people are just so oblivious when it comes to simple security online.
I hacked a female classmate's email a couple of year's back. Her email was registered with some obscure christian domain and her password reset question was… her NAME.
(Obviously I gave her her new password, and did cop some shit for doing what I did. In hindsight, I shouldn't have done that to a friend)
Zephyr_Pure wrote: [quote]macfarlanet wrote: I hacked a female classmate's email a couple of year's back. Her email was registered with some obscure christian domain and her password reset question was… her NAME.
Oh… so, YOU'RE who taught Dave Kernell how to hack.[/quote]
I think you mean
Oh… so, YOU'RE who taught Dave Kernell how to "hack".
spyware wrote:
Everyone has parents, so what? Boy should be awarded a medal for showing the public this hypocrisy. First, the current republican pressure caused privacy to cease to exist. Project Echelon is watching, always. Then Sarah's private mail account, which she used to communicate about non-private matters, gets hacked and partially exposed. Suddenly all the republicans scream "no respect for privacy" and "personal mail is personal!" and whatnot. They are either IDIOTS or HYPOCRITES, probably both.
Echelon made sure that private mails get SIGINT'ed before you can say "unbalanced and unfair".
.. I wasn't saying "no respect for privacy" I was merely stating the fact that he is a son of the government. He won't get into trouble because of this. I know its blatantly obvious not to use a public domain email address for government issues, and that they are hypocrites, idiots, and liars. I think though, we could take notes from this kid though, anything is possible if you find out enough information on your target.
The fact that David Kernell is the son of a government official is icing on the cake in book. As bl4ckc4t stated, he probably won't be punished too harshly, however I agree totally with spyware, Sarah Palin was completely out of line for using a private email provider and then crying wolf. She has gotten what she deserves. Hopefully the country will see what will be in store for us if the McCain camp is allowed in office.
Zephyr_Pure wrote: [quote]bl4ckc4t wrote: I know its blatantly obvious not to use a public domain email address for government issues
Not to mention the fact that it's against the law for a government official to use a non-government email address to conduct/discuss government business.[/quote]
"They are the law"
macfarlanet wrote: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_Yahoo_inbox_2008 Awesome, thanks for the link