I need a Program That...

If you need a program, let me know.

I am learning more and more c++ and need some projects for Personal Programs that (so far) don't deal with the internet. (i will learn this next).

1. If you want the script please ask at the time of request.
2. No Script testing.
3. I will not prove myself to anyone. If you think i should have to you are wrong. this is a FREE thing i'm doing to help myself and others out.
4. Please Stay on topic.
5. please be as detailed as you can.

I'm just curious - is it GUI or console applications?

A good and fast open source cracker with support for DES, MD5 and some different SHA algorithms would be nice ^^ ;)

ok i'll get working on it , and which would you like?(console or GUI)

Console ^^

ok im coding now.

OK this will take awhile. i'll get it to you as soon as it's done. any other suggestions?

Hell yes. A real coder not scared to make things or says i cant do that. I LIKE YOU ALREADY

Are u programming linux or windows based programs?

Windows (for now)

Since you doing windows i guess you using Dev enviroment. Have you ever tried the Visual Studio Enviroment.

Anyways i want a transparent substute for CMD completely customizable from color location at startup custom key commands. With the ability to drag and drop also paste using ctrl+V as well as bring up a word list while typring say i typeing in … Ipconfig it would have ability to finish figure out what i was typeing while i typed it so all i had to type in was ipc and it will give me the option through a drop down list to select ipconfig. That would be nice……

aspiring game developer, huh?

how about make me a basic game? :D

SET wrote: Hell yes. A real coder not scared to make things or says i cant do that. I LIKE YOU ALREADY something about this situation and this comment amuses me. maybe i'm just being an ass. nevermind.

@set-i'm curious, you call him a 'real coder' before you've even seen any results. what do you base your statement on?

A real coder is a philosophy to me. Someone that doesnt coward away from crap that takes a lil skill or says i cant do that right now becuase i dont know this or that. He just took on someones idea and only asked Console or Gui…Thats a freaking real programmer not like some people here that are like "i dont know networking"

if I remember correctly this is the guy who claimed to tried to write OS after learning C++ for two weeks….

but correct me if I'm wrong….

Nope, you're absolutely correct. He's also the genius who started about two other threads for exactly the same thing (program requests) and failed to return one program that was asked for. Ok, so he sent one back, but it had variables that weren't declared and all around didn't work.

maybe im confused but didnt he also send a game(i believe it was tic-tac-toe) and was written by someone else and after someone saw this he admitted to it.. maybe im wrong though..

Just to remind you all, he aint bound to do a shit.

SET wrote: A real coder is a philosophy to me. Someone that doesnt coward away from crap that takes a lil skill or says i cant do that right now becuase i dont know this or that. He just took on someones idea and only asked Console or Gui…Thats a freaking real programmer not like some people here that are like "i dont know networking" i get what you're saying, but your logic is incomplete. not cowering away is good, but that's only half of puzzle. if you take on a challenge and then give up, it doesnt do you much good.

and you also have to be able to recognize what is feasible and what is not. for example: deciding to write an OS after learnng a bit of C++ is not feasible.

eXXon wrote: maybe im confused but didnt he also send a game(i believe it was tic-tac-toe) and was written by someone else and after someone saw this he admitted to it.. maybe im wrong though..

there is a place where we can send in game we made?

I didn't know… if i did i would've send in my battleship game made in Javascript in a heartbeat….

it's really a dirty coding but I'm some what satisfied with it since I had to pull that project off in 3 weeks with absolutely no knowledge in Javascript.

but I think it's really great realistic practice of Javascript injection…

alka wrote: there is a place where we can send in game we made? You could always add it to the code bank ^^ ;)

Uber0n wrote: [quote]alka wrote: there is a place where we can send in game we made? You could always add it to the code bank ^^ ;)[/quote]

I am a md5 cracker with support of stupid, dictionary, digits and brute forcea while ago… but I can't send anything to the code bank, dunno why…

well what i meant is that he posted something in one of his threads.. or at least i think so. but yea the code bank would be great except that it's not really working. i've been wanting to post some code there but it never works.

hmmmm… dude you need more practice.

And asking people here is not the place to get it, because they'll want BIG things.

Youshould start small, start writing modular applications.

Createa permuatition generator, that spits out aaaa aaab aaac and so on to std fully customisble.

Then write a cracker that reads from stdin.

BAM brute force cracker.

That'sthe sort of thing you need to be doing.

A good place to get some challenges (however they may require more than just beginner skills) is http://projecteuler.net/ ^^

well, i'll get cracking on that game, oh and for that cmd i would use that too so i'll get on researching that.

yours31f wrote: well, i'll get cracking on that game, oh and for that cmd i would use that too so i'll get on researching that.

.. so you'll basically rewrite the command shell?

it's not the most advanced.. but fuck man, rewriting bash in python took my 8 hours, and i only implemented about 25 inbuilts and some limited piping.

richohealey wrote: rewriting bash in python took my 8 hours, and i only implemented about 25 inbuilts and some limited piping. 8 hours. pffft, slowing down are we rich?

Well i am going to do it over spring break next week. See how much i get since i will for sure add a thing so you can make your own keywords

Well my first returned program is here. i made a Riddle game and so let me know what you think of it.

http://www.thelastarcade.com/game.exe

yes its a small download.

hey i know there is a problem with question ( ithink it's ) eight. i'm fixing it now.

dude that site is cool i'm working on some now!!!

What position is my program in the queue?

richohealey wrote: [quote]yours31f wrote: well, i'll get cracking on that game, oh and for that cmd i would use that too so i'll get on researching that.

.. so you'll basically rewrite the command shell?

it's not the most advanced.. but fuck man, rewriting bash in python took my 8 hours, and i only implemented about 25 inbuilts and some limited piping.[/quote] Holy crap. I have to say I'm most impressed. I remember writing my remote admin tool, and how limited it was. Took me more than eight hours probably, even after I figured out the sockets. As for implementing piping, I don't even think I could wrap my head around that.

btw, I have a moderately fast md5 cracker in the code bank. Could easily try to speed it up, and extend it to do DES or sha

Of course, it is unlikely that anything produced here will rival mainstream programs.

never said anything i made was 1337

need faralas to resubmit your prog idea (lost it or never got it… not sure which)

hey that site has good programs for other programmers in the making…

what site?

Uber0n wrote: http://projecteuler.net/ ^^

Maybe? Not sure if thats the one or not.

Uber0n wrote: http://projecteuler.net/ ^^ Feralas wrote: Maybe? Not sure if thats the one or not. They don't offer any tutorials, just programming challenges ^^

A good place with tons of example code is http://planet-source-code.com/ ;)

both are great. no tutorials but good projects for you to study to make

digitalchameleon wrote: Of course, it is unlikely that anything produced here will rival mainstream programs.

Please do not confuse mainstream with "good".

Quality is not found within being widely known, being famous.

spyware wrote: [quote]digitalchameleon wrote: Of course, it is unlikely that anything produced here will rival mainstream programs.

Please do not confuse mainstream with "good".

Quality is not found within being widely known, being famous.[/quote]

Regardless it is still very unlikely that a program made here will rival it's open source counterpart. You may make a very good http server, but it's no apache. If you could produce code as good as or better than the apache team, you'd probably be a part of it, and you would probably contribute your code there.

Of course, this may sound discouraging. Please believe me when I say I do not hope to discourage anyone. I'm a big fan of what's going on in this thread. I've produced quite a few python scripts, knowing full well that it would be easier and more effective to download something for the same task. But that didn't stop me. You have to produce code to learn, all the tutorials in the world will only take you so far.

digitalchameleon wrote:

Regardless it is still very unlikely that a program made here will rival it's open source counterpart. You may make a very good http server, but it's no apache. If you could produce code as good as or better than the apache team, you'd probably be a part of it, and you would probably contribute your code there.

Of course, this may sound discouraging. Please believe me when I say I do not hope to discourage anyone. I'm a big fan of what's going on in this thread. I've produced quite a few python scripts, knowing full well that it would be easier and more effective to download something for the same task. But that didn't stop me. You have to produce code to learn, all the tutorials in the world will only take you so far.

Ah, the sound of a reasonable man. Yet I fear, my dear chameleon, that the reason you surfaced is not as reasonable as you think, for your words are not discouraging, but plainly wrong!

We -are- able to create magnificent things, project, like the Apache project you mentioned, only strengthen my words. It shows us what is possible, what can and HAS been done!

Really, the only difference between us and them is that in your mind. In the end, you type with the same hands, using the same brain and being the same human.

We are, they are too. Fact is, we both are, fully capable of the same things. The difference you believe there is, is no difference, it's a challenge.

spyware wrote: Ah, the sound of a reasonable man. Yet I fear, my dear chameleon, that the reason you surfaced is not as reasonable as you think, for your words are not discouraging, but plainly wrong!

We -are- able to create magnificent things, project, like the Apache project you mentioned, only strengthen my words. It shows us what is possible, what can and HAS been done!

The members list for the apache software foundation: http://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html Of course, these are just official members. In order to be nominated for membership, you already have to be contributing good code to the project already. I couldn't find a number of actual contributors, but I would guess it is most likely over 1000, counting off shoot projects as well. It's also been in production since 1995. So I hope you'll understand that I feel fairly confident in saying that no webserver produced here will become a better version of apache.

spyware wrote: Really, the only difference between us and them is that in your mind. In the end, you type with the same hands, using the same brain and being the same human.

We are, they are too. Fact is, we both are, fully capable of the same things. The difference you believe there is, is no difference, it's a challenge.

To say that people are fully capable of the same things is confusing to me. Are not some programmers more skilled than others? Perhaps not overall, but certainly in specific areas. Or are you speaking of the potential for growth within each of us? In that case, I agree with you to a certain extent.

Sorry. I'm not saying that people here are not good at programming, or that they cannot become better at it. I'm saying that a lot of software is produced by large organizations, while you are just one coder.

I really don't mean to discourage anyone, but I'll not hold my toungue just to protect others from what I feel is the truth. I just saw some requests here that seemed like reinventing the wheel to me, and painfully at that. I don't want to start any type of flame war, or even a heavy debate. :)

Here's my encouragement: If you want to make a splash programming, try doing something nobody's done before. Bittorrent is a good example of how a relatively simple piece of software can sweep through the world, just by filling a niche that was previously empty. When major software projects get overtaken, it is rarely by a better but similar project. More often it's by a completely new way of looking at things. Of course, it seems like the original poster was more interested in advancing his own skills, which is awesome.

digitalchameleon wrote:

Holy crap. I have to say I'm most impressed. I remember writing my remote admin tool, and how limited it was. Took me more than eight hours probably, even after I figured out the sockets. As for implementing piping, I don't even think I could wrap my head around that.

btw, I have a moderately fast md5 cracker in the code bank. Could easily try to speed it up, and extend it to do DES or sha

Of course, it is unlikely that anything produced here will rival mainstream programs.

It's not that hard to implement piping, if your code is modular then when you're reading fromt he stdout (return stream in the case of inbuilts) of each process, just check for a piping operator andthen pass it to either a fil on teh local system or to the stdin of the next process (instream of inbuilts).. its' just a matter of configuring an input stack before spawning forking off the process (to allow for a slightly classier sighandler), which in the prcoess lets you diddle around with the handles.

Really it's more about making your socket behave JUST like a file and then treating it as such, from there it's easy.

digitalchameleon wrote: The members list for the apache software foundation: http://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html Of course, these are just official members. In order to be nominated for membership, you already have to be contributing good code to the project already. I couldn't find a number of actual contributors, but I would guess it is most likely over 1000, counting off shoot projects as well. It's also been in production since 1995. So I hope you'll understand that I feel fairly confident in saying that no webserver produced here will become a better version of apache.

Did I say not, that we are capable of this? A man's work is not necessary his or her work alone. A collaboration of information and skill can exist everywhere, which is proved over and over by various projects started all around the world.

digitalchameleon wrote: To say that people are fully capable of the same things is confusing to me. Are not some programmers more skilled than others? Perhaps not overall, but certainly in specific areas. Or are you speaking of the potential for growth within each of us? In that case, I agree with you to a certain extent.

I indeed meant the potential growth. We are as limited as they were, as capable of breaking those limits as they did.

digitalchameleon wrote: Sorry. I'm not saying that people here are not good at programming, or that they cannot become better at it. I'm saying that a lot of software is produced by large organizations, while you are just one coder.

Did not every organization, whether it be large or small, start out with a sparkle? Start out with an idea, a thought or perhaps a dream? A dream is NOT a (guarantee for) success, but it just could be the start of the next Google, or heck, Apache.

digitalchameleon wrote: I really don't mean to discourage anyone, but I'll not hold my toungue just to protect others from what I feel is the truth. I just saw some requests here that seemed like reinventing the wheel to me, and painfully at that. I don't want to start any type of flame war, or even a heavy debate. :)

See, the potential growth is kicking in!

digitalchameleon wrote: Here's my encouragement: If you want to make a splash programming, try doing something nobody's done before. Bittorrent is a good example of how a relatively simple piece of software can sweep through the world, just by filling a niche that was previously empty. When major software projects get overtaken, it is rarely by a better but similar project. More often it's by a completely new way of looking at things. Of course, it seems like the original poster was more interested in advancing his own skills, which is awesome.

Wise words. Why reinvent the wheel while we can invent anything we want?

finally people are starting to see what this thread is all about. I am here to make REAL programs that you could use. The thing is though, i am only one person with a limited amount of time. The larger projects will have to wait on smaller programs so, this thread is not first come first serve. Sorry but i have to do it that way. But, i do thank anyone for choosing my programs over open source.

NEW PROJECT IDEA

Ok good idea/bad idea?

I'm thinking of making a super recorder.

1. key logger
2. click / mouse movement logger
3. reproducing
4. pauseable
5. password protected
6. hidden.

Sounds cool, arent there already a few of those

yours31f wrote: NEW PROJECT IDEA

Ok good idea/bad idea?

I'm thinking of making a super recorder.

1. key logger
2. click / mouse movement logger
3. reproducing
4. pauseable
5. password protected
6. hidden. if you figure out how to make it run hidden in the background, let me know becuase i made one and that was the only part i couldnt figure out. mine would only record if it was the active window.

o already know how and have a hidden keylogger Borrowed and edited by who i don't remeber but here is what you add to c++ code

    AllocConsole();
    stealth=FindWindowA("ConsoleWindowClass",NULL);
    ShowWindow(stealth,0);```

is there any header file you need with that?

ynori7 wrote: is there any header file you need with that? Probably just <windows.h> (or is it <window.h>?)

"windows" for dev not sure for others