Hanging Saddam
I agree to that..not only would it make Saddham hurt, it would set an example for other threatening countries..
@The person who said one less arab dictator down is a good thing, that is not entirely true..it may cause uprage in Iraq..and more suicide bombers etc to kill our soldiers.
i saw the censored video of it where it cut out just before the hanging. (the iraqi tv stations broadcast the whole thing).
even though he did deserve it the video was still horrible to watch. looking at sadams face just in the line up he looks so awful as he knows these are the last minutes before he dies. not to mention executioners mocking him before he's hung. was not a nice video, regardless of who it is, was still unconfortable to watch.
im still in 2 minds as to whether this will help iraq or hinder it. only time will tell i surpose.
i listened to it. you could hear hussein talk,to his 2 executioners… they said:you'll go straight to hell… hussein said:you're not acting like man…he talked some more,you heard the trap open,and that was it.
he deserved it…
and this is just my opinion,it'll probably generate some reactions, but i don't give a #h*t…G.W. Bush,deserves that too… he's a dictator too…the bush peace,ain't no mf'ing peace.
my 2 cents…
peace:happy:
Saddam will be more dangerous dead than he was alive. The iraqi people might start to see him as some sort of martyr, dying for his country. After all, there were no 'weapons of mass destruction'. If anyone should be hanged, it should be Bush. He started the whole mess in Iraq. The entire war was just for oil. Greedy Americans, always screwing things up for the world.:angry:
You can't create peace by starting a war. You can't save lives by killing.
It is time the American people start a riot and remove all of Bush's power.
Saddham's hanging was a stupid thing to do, America will be in trouble very soon. They already killed a minimum of 52139 innocent people in Iraq (according to http://www.iraqbodycount.org/).
(Oh, and the crap Iraq is happy about Saddam being gone is just because they now warship an even stronger dictator, Bush(?).)
Sigh :ninja:
no they haven't removed it. you should've seen some of the villages in iran,after saddam had attacked them with poisonous gas THAT'S SHOCKING!people who died of gas-attacks. this might be alittle shocking to you…but you hardly see anything…go find pictures of casualties of war, THAT'S SHOCKING,this is nothing. compared to what he deserved,he got away easy.
peace:happy:
p.s: bush deserves even worse.
spyware wrote: You can't create peace by starting a war. You can't save lives by killing.
It is time the American people start a riot and remove all of Bush's power.
Saddham's hanging was a stupid thing to do, America will be in trouble very soon. They already killed a minimum of 52139 innocent people in Iraq (according to http://www.iraqbodycount.org/).
(Oh, and the crap Iraq is happy about Saddam being gone is just because they now warship an even stronger dictator, Bush(?).)
Sigh :ninja:
agrees maybe if Bushes bitch ass left the iraq alone then none of this bull would happen americans wouldnt have to worry about bieng in danger we are only making enemys and not friends one more thing, its eid ul-adha –an islamic holiday and if u kill someone on a holiday that is seriously wrong and unfair thats like saying "make my day and kill him":evil: if u like it or not accept the fact-saddham was human:whoa: so think for ureselves and choose wisely:ninja:
darksun wrote:
Bush,deserves that too… he's a dictator too…the bush peace,ain't no mf'ing peace.
did you hear abuot the fbi going to a girls school because on bebo or myspace she said that g.w bush shuold die … apparently the fbi were shuoting at her and treatning lol… i aint sayin nuffin since freedom of speech has basicly been abolished B)
I believe there is already a thread or was a thread about the 911 conspiracy, but as each day of bush's regime goes by the more believable these stories become.
As for Saddam Hussein, Iraq was better of with him in charge as when he ruled there may have been a lot of torture but there was more control there than there is now. And since the English and American troops went in it is now our problem, and was all the loss of soldiers life's worth it as these "weapons of mass destruction" was never found to be existent?
about 911:
there's lots of footage available,that proof bush's wrong.
lot's of thing aren't right.but,in such a position,you can manipulate the world.thing that should be there after a severe crash,weren't there. a plane,simply loses it's wings crashing into a tower. i can name @least 50 things,that aren't in place,then, there's lots of footage,about those planes,they were actually cargo planes. those planes,were in a NO FLY ZONE,convieniently,no fighters were available….lots of stuff dude…
it's just sick,that if there are so many doubs,about such an event, that guy is still in the white house. it's a disgrace for the whole human race.
peace:happy:
edit:
agrees with spyware:
there is no oil in korea.
i guess you're right about that, but it WRONG.it's not all about america,the rest of the world should have a say in this.it's not the premier of the netherlands we're talking about here.that guy just does as he pleases, and went to iraq, semi for revenge,because of his daddy. that guy doesn't master his mother language that well (a terrorist isnt a terrist to name just A example) he grew up with weapons,has a rascist background, as well as being known to have a bad temper…i mean, that's not the defenition of a world leader.
it's just pathetic.
Posted on 31-12-06 15:08
Read above post and agrees
How about Korea? They have the weapons the VS was searching for in Iraq. Maybe it's going to be VS vs. Korea now, I doubt it though. there is no oil in Korea
i feel sorry for korea, they did an test and the warheads didnt even work :P, but iran is researching uranium …
What_A_Legend wrote: As for Saddam Hussein, Iraq was better of with him in charge as when he ruled there may have been a lot of torture but there was more control there than there is now. And since the English and American troops went in it is now our problem, and was all the loss of soldiers life's worth it as these "weapons of mass destruction" was never found to be existent?
Err… I disagree here. Yes there was control in Iraq, but the people were oppressed. Hundreds of thousands were dying. I believe the war in Iraq was wrong but it is a better place now in terms of number of deaths
What_A_Legend wrote: As for Saddam Hussein, Iraq was better of with him in charge as when he ruled there may have been a lot of torture but there was more control there than there is now. And since the English and American troops went in it is now our problem, and was all the loss of soldiers life's worth it as these "weapons of mass destruction" was never found to be existent?
Iraq WAS much better off with Saddam. Believe it or not, he kept terrorist groups at bay. On top of that, he killed a few hundred people who were planning on killing him first. So, the Americans, being the wonderful people they are(no offense to any Americans here…) march into war, kill thousands more innocent people, kill their leader, and call it justice? Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity. It just doesn't work.
PS. Sorry for the late post.
CrazyCaity123 wrote: [quote]What_A_Legend wrote: As for Saddam Hussein, Iraq was better of with him in charge as when he ruled there may have been a lot of torture but there was more control there than there is now. And since the English and American troops went in it is now our problem, and was all the loss of soldiers life's worth it as these "weapons of mass destruction" was never found to be existent?
Iraq WAS much better off with Saddam. Believe it or not, he kept terrorist groups at bay. On top of that, he killed a few hundred people who were planning on killing him first. So, the Americans, being the wonderful people they are(no offense to any Americans here…) march into war, kill thousands more innocent people, kill their leader, and call it justice? Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity. It just doesn't work.
PS. Sorry for the late post.[/quote]
I agree there there were good things and bad things with him there but look at them now.
darksun wrote: about 911:
there's lots of footage available,that proof bush's wrong.
lot's of thing aren't right.but,in such a position,you can manipulate the world.thing that should be there after a severe crash,weren't there. a plane,simply loses it's wings crashing into a tower. i can name @least 50 things,that aren't in place,then, there's lots of footage,about those planes,they were actually cargo planes. those planes,were in a NO FLY ZONE,convieniently,no fighters were available….lots of stuff dude…
it's just sick,that if there are so many doubs,about such an event, that guy is still in the white house. it's a disgrace for the whole human race.
peace:happy:
edit:
agrees with spyware:
there is no oil in korea.
Wow…I am not sure what you are arguing…is it that 911 was a conspiracy? Can you elaborate, and perhaps use better grammar?