Welcome to HBH! If you have tried to register and didn't get a verification email, please using the following link to resend the verification email.

THE MOST SHOCKING DOCUMENTARY ABOUT 9/11


ghost's Avatar
0 0

I've seen something similar before, I think it has something to do with the government too. If you read my 10 commandments day article these are exactly the events they want to trigger laws to make people "more religious"

Wierdly George Bush is very religious the two things could well be connected who knows.:o


ghost's Avatar
0 0

everything was fake… from the video of oussama bin laden to the call from the airplane… this is a MUST-SEE


ghost's Avatar
0 0

Meh, Theres alot more then that…. Try finding the footage of the planes going into the towers ;)


ghost's Avatar
0 0

watcher… what is the video that you talking about… and did u watch the video 'till the end?


SySTeM's Avatar
-=[TheOutlaw]=-
20 0

This video is quite old, a lot of people have seen it, and I'm sure there's already a thread on it :-/


bl4ckc4t's Avatar
Banned
0 0

heh, Yeterday they SHOWED the footage of the 'planes' hitting the pentagon. looked like a thomahawk cruise to me. too white of a flame. Bl4ckC4t


Mr_Cheese's Avatar
0 1

hmmm dont be easily led by everything you see in the video. i wouldnt go as far to say "everything" is fake.

the gouvernment could quite easily of covered things up because they were embarressed about the situation, or forgot about measures that could of prevented it etc.

dont believe everythings that fed to you. but that goes for both sides.


ghost's Avatar
0 0

omg! i watched that last year some time lol, its rather old, but yea i do recommend it, great to watch makes you think;)


Mr_Cheese's Avatar
0 1

bl4ckc4t wrote: looked like a thomahawk cruise to me. too white of a flame.

im not sure how much you know about cruise missles, but if a cruise missle was to hit the pentagon, there would be alot more damamge than what was caused.


ghost's Avatar
0 0

But the damage was not enough for a plane either.


ghost's Avatar
0 0

Of course the government has secrets, but this video is a little over the top. Dont believe everything you see. What are the chances nobody would see a missile flying into the pentagon?


ghost's Avatar
0 0

cough idiots cough What do you mean the dammage was not enough for a plane? 1041 km/h=1041000m/h=289.17m/s 412.8 t=412800N=412800/10=41280N momentum=289.17*41280=11936800Nm impulse=11936800Nm (jumbo jet shit)

no KE of plane. KE=0.5m.v²=0.5289.17²41280=1725902123J 1725902123J=1.73GJ 91,000 liters capasity aviation feul lets say at half capacity so 91000000cm³ -4190Kj per mol mr=86 p=0.659g.mol-1 so=59969000g 697313.95348837215mol 2921745465116.2793J or 2.9TJ 1.73GJ+2.9TJ =~3TJ If an average plane crashs 1.73GJ is released. Lets say 1.5GJ for a light plane (and im to lazy to right it out) 4.184 × 1012 J = 4.184 TJ – energy released by explosion of 1 kiloton of TNT 3TJ from the plane thats like 0.75kilotonnes of TNT now if you consider it liek that isnt it reason able?

This is basically what happened, a massive sword sliced through the buildings then 3 cruise missle hit them. lkets face it. a plane hit the towers and fucking took them down. get over it. blame the terrorist not america.


SySTeM's Avatar
-=[TheOutlaw]=-
20 0

Damn you and your maths :(


ghost's Avatar
0 0

Popular Mechanics did a whole thing on debunking this.

I'm a hardline left communist, and I don't even believe that the government would have done this type of thing.


ghost's Avatar
0 0

Wolfmankurd, there talking about the 'plane' that hit the pentagon, not the World Trade Centre.


Mr_Cheese's Avatar
0 1

also like to point out that modern buildings of that size (including buildings built before twin towers) were/are designed to withstand air strikes. so in theory if the building was built within its regulations and health & saftely blah blah blah then it shouldnt of collapsed.

(im not a conspiracy theorist.. just stating facts)


ghost's Avatar
0 0

same principles apply, and to say it must have been a cruise missile because a plane wouldnt do that much dammage is stupid, when in fcat witha stardard cruise missle a plane would proplaby do more dammage.


ghost's Avatar
0 0

on the pentagone, there's isn't any dommage of the wing, no debris etc

how can a plane do that?


ghost's Avatar
0 0

xposedbones wrote: on the pentagone, there's isn't any dommage of the wing, no debris etc

how can a plane do that?

Generally, when things explode, theres lots of fire. Fire generally burns things up. Thats how a plane can do that ^_^

And looking at pictures, theres plenty of debris…

While we're on the subject, heres a great documentary aswell: http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/12942/Quite_A_Chilling_Video


ghost's Avatar
0 0

lol but if you look at some picture of a plane crash, you'll see plenty of really BIG debris… and at the pentagone theres just really small debris… and there's a pic of the pentagone 4 day before the attack, and you can see a white line on the grass exactly when the plane has crashed


ghost's Avatar
0 0

you didnt even see the wing damage to the building… and on the video of the plane crash you dont see anything in the air like debris…:o:o:o:o:o