4D+ formula found! Proved that current formulas are WRONG

First off a hypercube of any dimension will always be the same. (2w)^n where n is the dimension and w is the width.

the sphere is a little diff. if you would truly like to know you must email me or PM me……i have proven this formula correct. or you can PM me with your version and i will tell you if it is right…..sort of a challenge.

so i open it up to you to find the formula for a n-hypersphere where n is the dimension. please choose three dimensions all above 4D.

I have found that the formula's for the hyperspheres on sites like wikipedia are WRONG!

All the Professors that have spent years looking at this i have finally proved their equation WRONG!

the whole

Vn(r) = πn/2 rn / (n/2)! for n even, and

Vn(r) = 2(n+1)/2 π(n-1)/2 rn / n!! for n odd

equation is WRONG!

only the first 3 dimensions work. Even the 0D is wrong. ^^

what the fuck are you on about and your sig is too big

you brought math class to HBH? xD

Ok, well idk shit about this hypercube thing, but are you sure your right b.c if professors have been working on this theory for years. Now you've think you've figured it out that easily are you sure your right?

Maybe you should contact them and tell them their work is wrong. And make your sig smaller.

Your sig is fucking annoying.

LOck-doWN wrote: I have found that the formula's for the hyperspheres on sites like wikipedia are WRONG!

All the Professors that have spent years looking at this i have finally proved their equation WRONG!

the whole

Vn(r) = πn/2 rn / (n/2)! for n even, and

Vn(r) = 2(n+1)/2 π(n-1)/2 rn / n!! for n odd

equation is WRONG!

only the first 3 dimensions work. Even the 0D is wrong. ^^

In this thread, you sound very much like a guy called Christos Tsolkas. NB That is a bad thing.

you should go over a concept called THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. it goes over many things a scientist should and shouldn't do. one of them is: "don't go and tell everyone and get everyone excited about your research/discoveries until, and not before, it has been tested/verified by your peers" in other words, PEER REVIEW where peers refers to people who know wtf you're talking about usually through a SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.

please stick to the accepted methods, theyre only there for the advance of science and the benefit of mankind.

why not post your discovery here. if it works then we'll all have learned something, otherwise we can point out mistakes before you present it to someone else.

ynori7: because i don't trust people……you know people could take the credit for my hard work. If you want to see it then wait and PM me and i will make a flash movie or some visual representation. Then when that is done i will show people. kk. ^^