What Linux should I get?
i think there's an active thread called "fedora vs. ubuntu", but i didnt read it so i dont know if it'd be helpful to you. i've found both of those to be pretty good. from what i can remeber fedora is a less demanding os as far as processor and ram requirements. but like eXXon said, it really depends on what you want to do with your system.
It really doesn't matter which one, if you know what you're doing.
Ubuntu is extremely easy to set up, but lacking in control as a result. Fedora is harder to set up, but yields more control. blahblahblah.
it's the same shit.
I have Debian on here, and it was a fun journey to get it set up. Granted, there were bumps along the way, but what do you expect? If you're trying to use linux as an easy desktop OS that "just works" (sound familiar?), then you're doing it wrong.
Think about WHY you want linux. Then, it'll be easier to choose a distro.
lesserlightsofheaven wrote: Think about WHY you want linux. Then, it'll be easier to choose a distro. hear, hear!
i wanted to mention that BLAG is basically fedora but with the restrictive codecs and drivers also installed. remember that they arent so easy to install in fedora as theyre in ubuntu (but livna.org will do this if you got fedora). also richard stallman recommended BLAG for begginers (as well as utotu) in a speech.